March, 2005

 

 

 

Let's Play Hypothetical Hockey!

Written in March of 2005 during the NHL Player's Strike. While the strike has settled, the concepts still apply.

 

With the cancellation of the National Hockey League season, there is little talk about hockey these days.  The ice has melted. The nets are stored away. The scoreboards are dark.  We're reduced to discussing hypothetical hockey.

 

Imagine you are the coach of the Chicago Black Hawks and scheduled to play a game against the Montreal Canadians at The Forum arena in Montreal.  Upon arriving at the arena, you meet the opposing coach who provides a tour of their remodeled facility.  As your tour progresses you inquire about two conspicuous absences.  There is no scoreboard above, and there are no nets on the rink.  The Canadians' coach explains that they are over budget and short on time and so the game will have to be played sans nets and scoreboard. Would you agree to play anyway?  Imagine what such a game might look like. Players skating, checking (yes, perhaps even fighting) in attempting to maintain possession of the puck.  For what purpose?

 

As silly as this sounds, there are an astonishing number of organizations demanding that their so-called teams perform under the these conditions. 

 

In Patrick Lencioni's book, The Five Dysfunctions of A Team, three of his notable dysfunctions relate to this score-free hockey game scenario.  

  1. Inattention to Results: If no one knows the score, where do you focus your effort?

  2. Avoidance of Accountability: In the absence of measurable goals, who really knows who's accountable for what? 

  3. Lack of Commitment: Is sustained commitment possible where winning or progress is unknown?

Note: Fear of Conflict and Absence of Trust are the other two.

 

How functional are your teams?  Ask yourself...

  • Are we attempting to run our business in a score-free environment?

  • Does everyone in our organization know where and when they're winning and where and when they're losing?

  • Do we hold meaningless performance reviews with arbitrary evaluations, or do our employees know their score and are able to rate themselves based on their measurable contributions to key achievements?

  • Are we keeping score of the right things or are we defeating our purpose with misaligned goals? 

How many workplaces have you seen where this is true? 

Applicant:

"Are raises around here automatic?

Or, do you have to work for them?" 

 

 

The better question is:

 

Can I get a raise here by showing up and looking busy?  Or do I have to actually contribute something measurable to our success?

 

Unless your nets (goals) are established and your scoreboard is current, how do your people effectively work toward a self-funding raise or bonus?

 

In what arenas are you confusing activity with achievement?

 

 

Free Assessment: Take your organizational temperature

Detailed Assessment: Discover your disconnects between desired achievements and the attitudes and activities in your organization.
 

Tom Lemanski of Vista Development serves as business catalyst and executive coach in the strategic development of SMARTer, executives, managers and sales professionals.

Visit the Working SMART Archives 

View Past Articles and Get Your Free Subscription

 

© 2008 Vista Development • Kildeer, IL 60047 • All rights Reserved  

• Working SMART: Library of Congress ISSN 1551-4633

 

Vista Development Home Page

 

Visit our affiliated sites

Chicago Executive Coaching   |  Executive Talent Assessments |  Chicago Sales Coaching